한국어 
日本語 
English 
Background
"Our team never got the training notice" — the recurring complaint.
Large-Scale Distributed Public Organization B
A large public organization with employees distributed across nationwide offices. New hire training was limited to 1-2 annual in-person sessions. Department training status had to be confirmed by the HRD team via phone calls. "Our department never received the training notice" was a recurring complaint.
A single HRD manager was tracking thousands of learners via spreadsheets. Frequent personnel rotations complicated department-level training history management. The limitations of a centralized control model were clear.
Solution
About 70 sub-admins run 70 classrooms in a distributed-governance model.
Large-Scale Distributed Public Organization B
Operational authority was distributed to approximately 70 sub-administrators, each managing their department. HQ HRD handled global settings and mandatory training deployment, while sub-admins autonomously managed content assignment, learning encouragement, non-completion follow-up, and new hire onboarding — each responsible for 30-50 employees.
Mission-based new hire onboarding was also introduced. New hires participated in live training and submitted pre-assignments on the social board, creating a mentorship touchpoint where senior employees commented on newcomer submissions.
Results
Speed, context, shared load — the three strengths of a sub-admin structure.
Large-Scale Distributed Public Organization B
The structure of 70 sub-administrators operating 70 classrooms delivered three benefits: speed (immediate response without routing through HQ), context (sub-admins understand field work context better than HQ), and load distribution (reduced management blind spots).
Non-completion tracking time was reduced, and department-specific training could be addressed immediately. Mission-based new hire onboarding created senior-junior interaction points, showing higher participation than traditional one-way assignment submission.
Insight
Find the balance between central control and local autonomy.
Large-Scale Distributed Public Organization B
Large public-sector L&D governance has to strike a balance somewhere between "central control" and "field autonomy." A system of about 70 sub-administrators is one answer to finding that balance — but not the only one. There is no guarantee that all 70 will operate at consistent quality; variance in sub-administrator capability, the burden of added workload, and whether HR evaluation is linked all affect actual operating quality.
